Ireland to Restrict Short-Term Lets in Towns Over 20,000 Population
- The Irish Government has reached an agreement in principle to restrict short-term lets in towns with populations above 20,000, raising the earlier proposed threshold of 10,000.
- Around 20 towns fall into this category under the 2022 Census, including Drogheda (44,135).
- Operators will have up to two years to obtain planning permission.
- Those active for seven years or more may qualify for Grandfather Regularisation.
- Legislation requiring full planning compliance will go before an Oireachtas committee.
- The Department of Housing is expected to issue further guidance.
- Tourism Minister Peter Burke said the measure is designed to help free up housing supply in the five cities while maintaining tourism resilience.
- The Irish Tourism Industry Confederation warned that most self-catering properties currently operate without planning permission and said unclear guidance could disrupt tourism in towns with limited hotel capacity.
Entities
Oireachtas: Ireland’s national parliament, which must review and advance the legislation.
Irish Tourism Industry Confederation (ITIC): The national tourism industry body representing accommodation and hospitality operators.
Snigdha’s Views
- Ireland is not imposing a ban; it is shifting STRs firmly into the planning system.
- The two-year transition and proposed Grandfathering signal compromise, but they also highlight enforcement complexity.
- Verification standards, approval timelines, and interpretation criteria remain undefined.
- What makes this sensitive is structure. Many towns above 20,000 still rely heavily on cottages and self-catering homes, often with limited hotel stock.
- Applying stricter planning filters without clear exemptions could compress tourism supply in destinations that are not purely urban housing markets.
- For PMs, the signal is regulatory friction. Larger towns now move from grey-zone operation to formal scrutiny. Planning timelines, legal costs, and eligibility risk should be factored into portfolio strategy before final rules are issued.
Saratoga Bans Short-Term Rentals, Introduces Fines and Platform Monitoring
- The Saratoga City Council voted on January 21 to enact a Total Prohibition on short-term rentals within city limits.
- The ordinance bans both operation and advertising of STR listings on platforms such as Airbnb and Vrbo.
- Violations carry escalating fines: $1,500 for a first offense, $3,000 for a second, and $5,000 for subsequent violations.
- The city is authorised to request listing data from platforms.
- A third-party monitoring firm will scan online listings for enforcement at an estimated annual cost of $5,000–$10,000.
- Officials acknowledged STRs could generate $60,000–$80,000 in annual revenue but said enforcement costs and resident concerns around noise, parking, and safety outweighed financial upside.
Entities
Saratoga City Council: The municipal authority that passed the prohibition.
Third-Party Monitoring Service: A contracted firm that scans rental platforms to identify non-compliant listings.
Snigdha’s Views
- Saratoga’s approach is not regulatory tightening, it is elimination backed by enforcement infrastructure.
- Escalating fines combined with Platform Data Access and third-party monitoring signal proactive policing. The era of complaint-driven enforcement is over in this jurisdiction.
- The location makes this notable. Saratoga sits within the Bay Area event corridor near Levi’s Stadium in Santa Clara, a region that recently commanded event-driven rate premiums during Super Bowl LX.
- Even in a high-demand event market, the city chose housing stability over tourism upside.
- For PMs, the takeaway is structural: STR viability increasingly depends less on demand strength and more on whether a city frames STRs as economic infrastructure or neighbourhood risk. In Saratoga, that framing is now explicit.
Bandon Pauses New Vacation Rental Applications for 120 Days
- The City of Bandon, Oregon has approved a 120-day Moratorium on new vacation rental applications.
- City officials say the pause will allow review of how STRs affect local housing supply.
- A 2023 housing study found Bandon will need more than 500 additional housing units over the next 20 years.
- The town currently has roughly 2,000 existing homes. Bandon already enforces strict rules. Only detached single-family homes at least three years old qualify.
- Coastal rentals require permits.
- No more than 30% of homes in a defined area may operate as vacation rentals. The moratorium may be extended for up to six months.
Entities
Bandon City Council: The local governing authority implementing the pause.
2023 Housing Needs Study: The assessment projecting a 500-unit housing shortfall over two decades.
Snigdha’s Views
- When a town of roughly 2,000 homes needs 500 more units, STRs inevitably become politically visible.
- Bandon already has caps and eligibility filters. The Moratorium suggests the city is reassessing whether those tools are sufficient.
- The risk is not the 120-day pause. The risk is post-review recalibration. Caps can be lowered. Permit requirements can tighten. Eligibility rules can narrow.
- For PMs in small coastal towns, this reinforces a broader pattern: even regulated markets are not settled.
- Maui is a clear example, initial regulations were challenged and partially overturned, but tighter rules were later reinstated as housing pressure intensified.
Snigdha Parghan is a Content Marketer at RSU by PriceLabs, where she creates articles, manages daily social media, and repurposes news and analysis into podcasts and video content for short-term rental professionals. With a focus on technology, operations, and marketing, Snigdha helps property managers stay informed and adapt to industry shifts.










